There’s a huge push globally to find cleaner alternative sources of energy to coal and oil, and this once again has major global powers revisiting uranium as a key energy source which could result in significant price appreciation in a commodity that has largely been ignored over the last decade. Indeed, a significant increase in price on uranium, to potentially USD$50 a pound, is not out of the realm of possibility if a number of macro-economic factors continue to align in its favour.  

We are approaching the one-year anniversary of the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declaring COVID-19 a global pandemic, forcing the lockdown of many major economies. As vaccinations hopefully allow us to turn the tide against the virus, there seems to be growing optimism that a broader global economic recovery is on the horizon.

As we move toward a recovery, it seems that big changes and a growing focus on the environment, social welfare and future-focused policy decisions will be more important than ever. Governments everywhere are setting ambitious goals and aiming for zero emissions over the next 20 years. These goals will require a completely different approach to energy generation than we've seen in our lifetime.

For example, Shell, a major oil and gas company, recently announced that it anticipates its oil production to decline — a major shift in its stated strategy. In addition to Shell, other major oil and gas companies, like BP, are rebranding themselves as energy companies and investing in renewable energy. A focus on alternative energy sources seems to be on everyone's mind.

Stimulus plans from global governments are boosting commodities, with many of them off to great start so far in 2020. Uranium, which may play an important role in the shift towards renewables, is no exception.

Uranium’s Role in the Energy Revolution


Nuclear power is a zero-emission clean energy source, like solar, wind or hydro power. It also  can  offset  air pollution and atmospheric CO2 emissions  produced by “dirtier” energy generation sources.

In the United States, the largest economy in the world and one of the world’s largest producers and consumers of oil, U.S. President Joe Biden has made it clear that climate change is a priority for his administration. One of his first decisions as President was to rejoin the Paris Agreement, a legally binding climate change treaty led by the United Nations implemented to curb global warming. While this is certainly a positive for renewable energy such as solar and wind, could it also be a positive for the fate of the 90+ nuclear reactors currently operating in the U.S.?

Nuclear power currently provides 20% of U.S. electricity and 55% of its emission-free power. But the same reactors have been under a lot of competitive pressure on the energy market from cheap natural gas. Since the shale gas revolution began in the 2010s — which enabled the U.S. to significantly increase its domestic oil and natural gas production with hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling — nuclear power plants have been struggling to be economically competitive and several have closed early. Others are currently facing the same fate.

However, this has not been the only bad news for uranium. Globally, the uranium market has been in a bear market for the better part of the past decade. Since the Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011, uranium prices have been overwhelmed by excess inventory from nuclear plant closures and scrapped growth plans. Japan shut down all of its nuclear plants following Fukushima and have been slow to turn them back on following the disaster, and other countries seemed to have moved away from nuclear power following the accident. Germany made a commitment to get out of nuclear, while China slowed down new reactor approvals and constructions. The public concerns over the environmental impacts surrounding the topic of nuclear waste disposal also remains an issue for governments considering recommissioning aging nuclear power plants and the planning of future nuclear initiatives

To adjust to this new reality, the supply of uranium had to be cut back. And due to long-term contracts, these production adjustments were slow to arrive. But in the past few years, we've seen significant uranium supply reductions. Saskatoon-based Cameco, the world’s largest publicly traded uranium company, took the largest step by shutting down the MacArthur River mine, which was the largest uranium mine in the world. Several other uranium mines have closed in the past several years, including Langer Heinrich, Ranger, Cominak, while Kazakhstan's uranium miner Kazatomprom and BHP's Olympic Dam in Australia have reduced growth plans.

COVID-19’s Impact on Uranium

The pandemic has affected different sectors in different ways, but uranium supply was dramatically impacted by the coronavirus. Global uranium production was already in a downtrend before the pandemic hit, but the problems has only been exacerbated by COVID-19 protocols.

The Cigar Lake mine in Saskatchewan, at the time, the largest actively producing uranium mine in the world, was forced to shut down during the initial lockdown in spring 2020 and is now once again in lockdown. Kazakhstan, the world’s largest producer of uranium, has also seen production growth curtailed, further increasing the expected uranium deficit as global demand increases. Even entering into 2020, there wasn't enough primary supply to satisfy existing demand and inventories were being drawn down, but with all of the disruption caused by the pandemic, this deficit has likely only increased. 

And what of future demand? The International Energy Agency (IEA) has been clear: if we are to meet our climate change goals, nuclear power will have to be part of the solution. Germany’s case might serve as a cautionary tale: while they were able to generate over 40% of their energy from renewables in 2018, they still rely on fossil fuels for 39% of their energy needs. Furthermore, despite their big gains in wind and solar, Germany still generates more than double the CO2 emissions of neighbouring France, a country that relies on nuclear for 70% of its energy needs (though France has plans to reduce this to 50% by 2035).

Where does each country stack up on nuclear energy generation? Learn more here:
Each Country's Share of CO2 Emissions (August 12, 2020)

The Potential Future of Uranium

It has taken a long time, but we are finally at the point where not only is uranium demand increasing once more, but nuclear power generation is higher today than before the Fukushima accident. Most of the growth for nuclear power generation is coming from Asia. Two of the fast growing economies in the world, China and India, currently have the largest number of reactors under construction in the Asian region.

As a zero-emission energy source, uranium can play a role in countries where air pollution is a challenge. Currently, both China and India predominantly rely on coal for electricity generation, and both of these countries struggle with bad air quality and reduced life expectancy from air pollution. It can also be a helpful replacement for some renewable energy sources; Russia, a country where solar is not a useful option in the winter months, is investing heavily in nuclear.

Finally, we are also noticing a change in attitude towards nuclear energy in North America. The United States recently passed the American Nuclear Infrastructure Act (ANIA), a bipartisan bill aimed at promoting new nuclear technologies. Canadian governments at the provincial and federal level have also pledged support to develop new Small Modular Reactor (SMR) technologies: a smaller, and potentially safer, version of the traditional nuclear reactor that could be particularly useful for powering smaller and remote northern communities. In the media, Bill Gates recently appeared on 60 Minutes discussing the next generation reactors his company, TerraPower, is working on in his quest to help with addressing climate change.

We are seeing a fairly classic set up in economics: a commodity where demand is projected to grow as planned nuclear reactors are built, while supply has been constrained by mine closures, low investment and a decade of low prices. In our view, the expected outcome to this situation is continued support for uranium prices. Most of the new mines will require much higher prices than we have today to incentivize production, with many requiring at least 50$/pound to be profitable. Are higher prices around the corner?

Invest in Uranium with HURA

Investors interested in this commodity could consider the Horizons Global Uranium Index ETF (“HURA”). Its underlying index, the Solactive Global Uranium PurePlay Index, provides exposure to issuers primarily involved in the uranium mining and exploration industry, or invest and participate directly in the physical price of uranium.


Source: Bloomberg as at January 31, 2021. **PERFORMANCE SINCE INCEPTION ON MAY 15, 2019, AS AT JANUARY 31, 2021

The indicated rates of return are the historical annual compounded total returns, including changes in unit value and reinvestment of all distributions, and do not take into account sales, redemption, distribution or optional charges or income taxes payable by any securityholder that would have reduced returns. Additionally, index returns do not take into account management, operating or trading expenses that may be incurred in replicating the index. The rates of return above are not indicative of future returns. The ETF is not guaranteed, it’s value changes frequently, and past performance may not be repeated. The index is not directly investible.
Commissions, management fees and applicable sales taxes all may be associated with an investment in the Horizons Global Uranium Index ETF (the “ETF”) managed by Horizons ETFs Management (Canada) Inc. The ETF is not guaranteed, its values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. The prospectus contains important detailed information about the ETF. Please read the prospectus before investing.
The views/opinions expressed herein may not necessarily be the views of Horizons ETFs Management (Canada) Inc. All comments, opinions and views expressed are of a general nature and should not be considered as advice to purchase or to sell mentioned securities. Before making any investment decision, please consult your investment advisor or advisors.

Download PDF

Share This Article

Next article

The Market Forces Driving the Recent Asset Class Declines

This website uses cookies to ensure we give you the best experience. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to read our privacy policy.

Commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with an investment in exchange traded products managed by Horizons ETFs Management (Canada) Inc. (the "Horizons Exchange Traded Products"). The Horizons Exchange Traded Products are not guaranteed, their value changes frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Certain ETFs may have exposure to leveraged investment techniques that magnify gains and losses and which may result in greater volatility in value and could be subject to aggressive investment risk and price volatility risk. Such risks are described in the prospectus. The prospectus contains important detailed information about the ETF. Please read the relevant prospectus before investing.

The Horizons Exchange Traded Products include our BetaPro products (the “BetaPro Products”). The BetaPro Products are alternative mutual funds within the meaning of National Instrument 81-102 Investment Funds, and are permitted to use strategies generally prohibited by conventional mutual funds: the ability to invest more than 10% of their net asset value in securities of a single issuer, to employ leverage, and engage in short selling to a greater extent than is permitted in conventional mutual funds. While these strategies will only be used in accordance with the investment objectives and strategies of the BetaPro Products, during certain market conditions they may accelerate the risk that an investment in shares of a BetaPro Product decreases in value. The BetaPro Products consist of our Daily Bull and Daily Bear ETFs (“Leveraged and Inverse Leveraged ETFs”), Inverse ETFs (“Inverse ETFs”) and our BetaPro S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures™ ETF (the “VIX ETF”). Included in the Leveraged and Inverse Leveraged ETFs and the Inverse ETFs are the BetaPro Marijuana Companies 2x Daily Bull ETF (“HMJU”) and BetaPro Marijuana Companies Inverse ETF (“HMJI”), which track the North American MOC Marijuana Index (NTR) and North American MOC Marijuana Index (TR), respectively. The Leveraged and Inverse Leveraged ETFs and certain other BetaPro Products use leveraged investment techniques that can magnify gains and losses and may result in greater volatility of returns. These BetaPro Products are subject to leverage risk and may be subject to aggressive investment risk and price volatility risk, among other risks, which are described in their respective prospectuses. Each Leveraged and Inverse Leveraged ETF seeks a return, before fees and expenses, that is either up to, or equal to, either 200% or –200% of the performance of a specified underlying index, commodity futures index or benchmark (the “Target”) for a single day. Each Inverse ETF seeks a return that is –100% of the performance of its Target. Due to the compounding of daily returns a Leveraged and Inverse Leveraged ETF’s or Inverse ETF’s returns over periods other than one day will likely differ in amount and, particularly in the case of the Leveraged and Inverse Leveraged ETFs, possibly direction from the performance of their respective Target(s) for the same period. For certain Leveraged and Inverse Leveraged ETFs that seek up to 200% or up to or -200% leveraged exposure, the Manager anticipates, under normal market conditions, managing the leverage ratio as close to two times (200%) as practicable however, the Manager may, at its sole discretion, change the leverage ratio based on its assessment of the current market conditions and negotiations with the respective ETF’s counterparties at that time. Hedging costs charged to BetaPro Products reduce the value of the forward price payable to that ETF. Due to the high cost of borrowing the securities of marijuana companies in particular, the hedging costs charged to HMJI are expected to be material and are expected to materially reduce the returns of HMJI to unitholders and materially impair the ability of HMJI to meet its investment objectives. Currently, the manager expects the hedging costs to be charged to HMJI and borne by unitholders will be between 10.00% and 45.00% per annum of the aggregate notional exposure of HMJI’s forward documents. The hedging costs may increase above this range. The manager publishes on its website, the updated monthly fixed hedging cost for HMJI for the upcoming month as negotiated with the counterparty to the forward documents, based on the then current market conditions. The VIX ETF, which is a 1x ETF, as described in the prospectus, is a speculative investment tool that is not a conventional investment. The VIX ETF’s Target is highly volatile. As a result, the VIX ETF is not intended as a stand-alone long-term investment. Historically, the VIX ETF’s Target has tended to revert to a historical mean. As a result, the performance of the VIX ETF’s Target is expected to be negative over the longer term and neither the VIX ETF nor its target is expected to have positive long-term performance. BetaPro Bitcoin ETF (“HBIT”), and BetaPro Inverse Bitcoin ETF (“BITI”), which are a 1X ETF, and an up to -1X ETF, respectively, as described in the prospectus, are speculative investment tools that are not conventional investments. Their Target, an index which replicates exposure to rolling Bitcoin Futures and not the spot price of Bitcoin, is highly volatile. As a result, neither ETF is intended as a stand-alone investment. There are inherent risks associated with products linked to crypto-assets, including Bitcoin Futures. While Bitcoin Futures are traded on a regulated exchange and cleared by regulated central counterparties, direct or indirect exposure to the high level of risk of Bitcoin Futures will not be suitable for all types of investors. An investment in any of the BetaPro Products is not intended as a complete investment program and is appropriate only for investors who have the capacity to absorb a loss of some or all of their investment. Please read the full risk disclosure in the prospectus before investing. Investors should monitor their holdings in BetaPro Products and their performance at least as frequently as daily to ensure such investment(s) remain consistent with their investment strategies.

Horizons Total Return Index ETFs (“Horizons TRI ETFs”) are generally index-tracking ETFs that use an innovative investment structure known as a Total Return Swap to deliver index returns in a low-cost and tax-efficient manner. Unlike a physical replication ETF that typically purchases the securities found in the relevant index in the same proportions as the index, most Horizons TRI ETFs use a synthetic structure that never buys the securities of an index directly. Instead, the ETF receives the total return of the index through entering into a Total Return Swap agreement with one or more counterparties, typically large financial institutions, which will provide the ETF with the total return of the index in exchange for the interest earned on the cash held by the ETF. Any distributions which are paid by the index constituents are reflected automatically in the net asset value (NAV) of the ETF. As a result, the Horizons TRI ETF receives the total return of the index (before fees), which is reflected in the ETF’s share price, and investors are not expected to receive any taxable distributions. Certain Horizons TRI ETFs (Horizons Nasdaq-100 ® Index ETF and Horizons US Large Cap Index ETF) use physical replication instead of a total return swap. The Horizons Cash Maximizer ETF and Horizons USD Cash Maximizer ETF use cash accounts and do not track an index but rather a compounding rate of interest paid on the cash deposits that can change over time.

*The indicated rates of return are the historical annual compounded total returns including changes in per unit value and reinvestment of all dividends or distributions and do not take into account sales, redemption, distribution or optional charges or income taxes payable by any securityholder that would have reduced returns. The rates of return shown in the table are not intended to reflect future values of the ETF or returns on investment in the ETF. Only the returns for periods of one year or greater are annualized returns.