June 20, 2019

Note: Nicolas Piquard is the portfolio manager of Canada’s first uranium ETF – the Horizons Global Uranium Index ETF (HURA). 

It is tempting to talk about Kazakhstan's dominant position as a uranium producer in the same context that Saudi Arabia dominates oil production.

For one, Kazakhstan currently produces about 40% of the global uranium supply – a figure that far exceeds the second on the list, Canada, which produces approximately 20%1. This dominance even exceeds Saudi Arabia's position in the Oil market. Although the Saudis produce about 12 million barrels of oil per day2,they have recently been surpassed by the U.S. as the world’s biggest producer. From a production perspective, Kazakhstan has an even more globally dominant position in uranium than Saudi Arabia has in oil.

Secondly, let’s look at global reserves. Saudi Arabia has 266 billion barrels of oil in reserves – which far exceeds the other big producers; the U.S. and Russia – each of which has less than 100 billion barrels. Australia has the largest uranium reserves in the world with 30% of the global supply, followed by Kazakhstan at 14%. When it comes to energy reserves, both Kazakhstan and Saudi Arabia enjoy large numbers, ranking second globally for uranium and oil respectively3.

Thirdly, a dominant position is not particularly useful if your costs of production are too high.  This is where Saudi Arabia has a big edge relative to its competition: According to this recent Bloomberg article, Aramco’s (a Saudi Arabian petroleum and natural gas company) extraction cost on a per barrel basis is $2.80. This gives them a big advantage over competitors.   Kazakhstan also enjoys a similar advantage in their production of uranium. With all-in-cash- costs of less than USD $15 per pound of uranium, and cash costs under USD $10, Kazakhstan has the lowest uranium production costs in the world and still makes money despite the fact that the price of uranium is down over 80% from its high and currently sitting around $25 per pound 4.

So far, based on the above criteria, it seems fair to compare Kazakhstan’s dominant position in uranium to that of Saudi Arabia in oil. 

But there is a big difference. Oil prices dominate the Saudi Arabian economy. In fact, according to the CIA World Factbook, oil represents over 90% of Saudi Arabia’s exports to the rest of the world5. Similar circumstances don’t exist in Kazakhstan. The global uranium market is comparatively small and oil actually represents a bigger portion of the Kazakh economy than uranium. This means that oil prices have a bigger impact on the Kazakhstan economy compared to uranium.

Saudi Arabia’s currency (the riad) is fixed to the U.S. dollar, while the Kazakh currency (the tenge) is not. This is significant, because it means that Saudis haven't been depreciating their currency in tough times when oil prices were low, nor witnessed their currency rise in good times during higher oil prices. Canadians will certainly be familiar with this effect over the past 20 years because the Canadian dollar has a tendency to rise and fall with oil prices.

The tenge has been volatile. In fact, in August 2015, with oil prices slumping and the Kazakh economy struggling, the government decided to float the currency which led to a large currency devaluation6.  This allowed the economy to recover by helping exports – including lowering the costs of their uranium mine production. But like many devaluations, these gains can be short-lived as increasing inflation slowly increases costs higher.  

Kazatomprom is the majority state-owned uranium Kazakh producer, and the most of their costs are denominated in the local currency. According to the company’s recent IPO filing and their historical all-in-cash-costs, it’s possible to see how correlated its value is to the local currency.



* This is the average of the monthly closing FX rates over the period (Source: Bloomberg).
** This is the Kazatomprom all-in-sustaining-cash-costs for uranium production in U.S. dollars (Source: Kazatomprom Prospectus).

In 2016, Kazakhstan embarked on a large set of reforms to diversify its economy and restructure its finances in an effort to avoid another large currency devaluation. If successful, this could potentially lead to further currency strength and threaten Kazakhstan’s position as the world’s undisputed low-cost uranium provider. Currently, Kazakhstan's low costs give it a significant buffer against falling uranium prices, but it may not last forever.

The views/opinions expressed herein may not necessarily be the views of Horizons ETFs Management (Canada) Inc. All comments, opinions and views expressed are of a general nature and should not be considered as advice to purchase or to sell mentioned securities. Before making any investment decision, please consult your investment advisor or advisors.

1 Source: Uranium and Nuclear Power in Kazakhstan, World Nuclear Association, April 2019. 
2 Source: Bloomberg, April 2, 2019. 
3 Sources for all oil reserves figures: U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2018.
4 Source: NYMEX Front Month Futures Contract, Bloomberg, as at June 12, 2019. 
5 Source: Central Intelligence Agency, World Factbook, June, 2019.
6 Source: Kazakhstan – A Long Road to Recovery, World Bank Group, Summer 2016.

Share This Article

Next article

Cyber Security – It’s as Serious as a Heart Attack in Hiding

This website uses cookies to ensure we give you the best experience. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to read our privacy policy.

Commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with an investment in exchange traded products managed by Horizons ETFs Management (Canada) Inc. (the "Horizons Exchange Traded Products"). The Horizons Exchange Traded Products are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. The prospectus contains important detailed information about the Horizons Exchange Traded Products. Please read the relevant prospectus before investing.

The Horizons Exchange Traded Products include our BetaPro products (the “BetaPro Products”). The BetaPro Products are alternative mutual funds within the meaning of National Instrument 81-102 Investment Funds, and are permitted to use strategies generally prohibited by conventional mutual funds: the ability to invest more than 10% of their net asset value in securities of a single issuer, to employ leverage, and engage in short selling to a greater extent than is permitted in conventional mutual funds. While these strategies will only be used in accordance with the investment objectives and strategies of the BetaPro Products, during certain market conditions they may accelerate the risk that an investment in sahres of a BetaPro Product decreases in value. The BetaPro Products consist of our 2x Daily Bull and 2x Daily Bear ETFs (“2x Daily ETFs”), Inverse ETFs (“Inverse ETFs”) and our BetaPro S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures™ ETF (the “VIX ETF”). Included in the 2x Daily ETFs and the Inverse ETFs are the BetaPro Marijuana Companies 2x Daily Bull ETF (“HMJU”) and BetaPro Marijuana Companies Inverse ETF (“HMJI”), which track the North American MOC Marijuana Index (NTR) and North American MOC Marijuana Index (TR), respectively. The 2x Daily ETFs and certain other BetaPro Products use leveraged investment techniques that can magnify gains and losses and may result in greater volatility of returns. These BetaPro Products are subject to leverage risk and may be subject to aggressive investment risk and price volatility risk, among other risks, which are described in their respective prospectuses. Each 2x Daily ETF seeks a return, before fees and expenses, that is either 200% or –200% of the performance of a specified underlying index, commodity futures index or benchmark (the “Target”) for a single day. Each Inverse ETF seeks a return that is –100% of the performance of its Target. Due to the compounding of daily returns a 2x Daily ETF’s or Inverse ETF’s returns over periods other than one day will likely differ in amount and, particularly in the case of the 2x Daily ETFs, possibly direction from the performance of their respective Target(s) for the same period. Hedging costs charged to BetaPro Products reduce the value of the forward price payable to that ETF. Due to the high cost of borrowing the securities of marijuana companies in particular, the hedging costs charged to HMJI are expected to be material and are expected to materially reduce the returns of HMJI to unitholders and materially impair the ability of HMJI to meet its investment objectives. Currently, the manager expects the hedging costs to be charged to HMJI and borne by unitholders will be between 10.00% and 45.00% per annum of the aggregate notional exposure of HMJI’s forward documents. The hedging costs may increase above this range. The manager will publish, on its website, the updated monthly fixed hedging cost for HMJI for the upcoming month as negotiated with the counterparty to the forward documents, based on the then current market conditions. The VIX ETF, which is a 1x ETF, as described in the prospectus, is a speculative investment tool that is not a conventional investment. The VIX ETF’s Target is highly volatile. As a result, the VIX ETF is not intended as a stand-alone long-term investment. Historically, the VIX ETF’s Target has tended to revert to a historical mean. As a result, the performance of the VIX ETF’s Target is expected to be negative over the longer term and neither the VIX ETF nor its target is expected to have positive long-term performance. Investors should monitor their holdings in BetaPro Products and their performance at least as frequently as daily to ensure such investment(s) remain consistent with their investment strategies.

*The indicated rates of return are the historical annual compounded total returns including changes in per unit value and reinvestment of all dividends or distributions and do not take into account sales, redemption, distribution or optional charges or income taxes payable by any securityholder that would have reduced returns. The rates of return shown in the table are not intended to reflect future values of the ETF or returns on investment in the ETF. Only the returns for periods of one year or greater are annualized returns.